‘Without Blood’ Review: Salma Hayek Cannot Save Angelina Jolie’s Inert Revenge Melodrama [TIFF]

TORONTO – Perhaps it’s the subject matter she has gravitated to or the glare of the global spotlight, but it is embarassing how little respect Angelina Jolie has received as a filmmaker. Three of her first four narrative films as a director, “Unbroken,” “In The Land of Honey,” and “First They Killed My Father,” have demonstrated considerable cinematic skills. And, yet, when female directors are touted or pitched for projects you never hear her name. Despite more clear evidence of her impressive eye, it’s disheartening to reveal that her latest effort, “Without Blood,” will not improve her standing in the cultural zeitgeist.

READ MORE: “On Swift Horses” Review: Jacob Elordi and Daisy Edgar-Jones can’t spark this queer drama [TIFF]

An adaptation of Alessandro Baricco‘s 2002 novel, and written by Jolie herself, the movie primarily centers on two middle-aged Spanish souls with an unexpected connection. When Nina (Salma Hayek) buys a lottery ticket at the newspaper stand of the older Tito (Demián Bichir) he doesn’t immediately recognize her. But when he does, and she invites, well, insists he join her for coffee, he knows that the angel of death he’s dreaded has finally arrived.

No filler. All killer. Sign up for The Playlist Newsletter. Once a day.*
*Unless there is insane breaking news you need to know about

Decades earlier, after the end of the Spanish Civil War, a rogue soldier, Salinas (Juan Minujín), and two of his cohorts arrived at the home of Manuel Roaca (Alfredo Herrera), a doctor who served on the side of the losing Nationalists. Their intentions were deadly, but they were unaware that Roaca’s teenage son and young daughter were on the premises. And that initially gives them pause. Salinas, who believed Roaca was intentionally mutilating injured soldiers, did not want this confrontation to take place in front of innocents. Still, when things get out of hand, he gets his revenge. Even if collateral damage comes with it. Then again, unbeknownst to him, the little girl, Nina, escaped. Oh, and as you may have guessed, one of Salina’s lackeys was a young Tito (Ariel Perez Lima) whose rifle shot was partially responsible for the death of Nina’s father.

Without Blood

Over almost 90 minutes of screen time, Nina and Tito sit across from each other telling tales they have heard or experienced over the years since. Tragically, Nina’s life has played out like an epic melodrama where a teenage marriage to a powerful local warlord is almost an afterthought once her three sons betray her by committing her to an institution (the movie leaves it vague if she needs the treatment or not). And Tito? Once he saw that Salinas had been mysteriously poisoned, he knew his days, months, or years were numbered.

As compelling as the stories Nina and Tito share are, this structure is anything but. Despite continual flashbacks, their conversation is often excruciatingly claustrophobic and lifeless. This is partially because, shockingly, Bichir is unable to give his character the gravitas or depth to make him compelling whatsoever. Hayek is doing her absolute best and is often the only reason to keep watching, but there are only so many times Jolie can cut back to her twirling her teacup or taking a swig of a cigarette. Objectively, we’re not sure how many other actors or filmmakers could pull this scenario off. It was seemingly potent on paper, but behind the camera, it just plays out like a massive miscalculation.

The result is a melodrama where any sense of tension fades the longer Nina and Tito speak. This is unfortunate because Jolie delivers a fantastic prologue when Roaca’s home is attacked. The Victorian-era house, surrounded by hundreds of yards of dried grass, is a striking visual set piece. Jolie lays out the initial confrontation with captivating framing (it might be some of cinematographer Seamus McGarvey‘s best work in over a decade) and deft pacing. There is a vision at work here. She lets Minujín, in particular, soak up the spotlight in a riviting turn that teases what the movie could have been. But then the film changes focus and becomes stuck at a table where two characters talk around each other in circles. And when you realize you neither care for them nor their stories, it all fades to dust. [C-]

Related Posts

Meet the Man Behind the On-Screen Singing of Ariana Grande, Timothée Chalamet and Angelina Jolie: Vocal Coach Eric Vetro

Ariana Grande in “Wicked,” Timothée Chalamet in “A Complete Unknown” and Angelina Jolie in “Maria”: What these performances have in common – besides a strong shot at…

Angelina Jolie Worried About Upsetting Her Kids Who Worked on ‘Maria’ With Her: ‘They Hadn’t Experienced Me Expressing a Lot of the Pain’

In a revealing interview with BBC News, Angelina Jolie opened up about how filming her Maria Callas biopic led to unprecedented emotional vulnerability with her children on…

Angelina Jolie Opened Up About Her “Very Dark” Years Away From the Spotlight

After a several year hiatus away from Hollywood, Angelina Jolie is ready to step back into the spotlight. In a new interview with Vanity Fair published on…

Angelina Jolie Reveals the ‘New Way’ She’s Being Honest with Her Kids About the ‘Pain’ Parents Usually Hide

Angelina Jolie is opening up about being unable to hide her pain from her children while working on her new film, Maria. While speaking with the BBC about…

Angelina Jolie makes heartbreaking admission about ‘very dark’ period after moving away from Hollywood

Angelina Jolie has described a 'dark' period in her life after moving away from Hollywood. The Girl, Interrupted actor, 49, is currently embroiled in a lengthy court…

Angelina Jolie Details “Very Dark” Period Away From Hollywood

Angelina Jolie is stepping back into the spotlight after a dark era. The Oscar winner took a break from acting from a couple of years before filming…