In a recent Hollywood Reporter article, Lawrence showcases her producer role on a pro-abortion documentary, Zurawski v Texas, alongside abortion cheerleaders Hillary and Chelsea Clinton.
“I’m voting for Kamala Harris because I think she’s an amazing candidate, and I know that she will do whatever she can to protect reproductive rights,” Lawrence told PEOPLE about Harris, who can’t name a single abortion limit she supports.
“Women are dying,” Lawrence continues, saying that with this new pro-abortion documentary, she hopes to “enlighten people’s idea of what abortion is and why certain people need abortions — and why it’s so important to keep lawmakers out of families and out of people’s doctors’ offices… These laws are made by random white men, and they’re not made by healthcare providers.”
Sadly, her idea of showing people “what abortion is” entails telling a twisted tale that has nothing to do with the harms and fatality of Chemical Abortion Pills, the gruesome surgical abortion process, when children are ripped limb by limb in the womb, abortion’s physical and mental impact on women, and finally, the fact that abortion takes the life of an innocent preborn baby. That’s abortion in a nutshell.
Instead, Lawrence, alongside abortion cheerleaders Chelsea and Hillary Clinton, are deciding to focus on a Texas lawsuit case. Texas is one of the most pro-life states in America, which limits all abortions unless the mother’s life is at risk.
The case’s plaintiff is Amanda Zurwaski, who was denied an abortion at over four months pregnant and had a premature rupture of membranes, which is a prelabor breaking of the amniotic sac before labor. She ended up getting sepsis but thankfully survived. Whether Zurwaski refused to deliver early or the doctors misinterpreted Texas law is unknown. She, along with other women, blames Texas abortion law for not giving her life-saving care. However, this is clearly written in Texas law, as is in every other abortion law in all 50 states.
The Texas Heartbeat Law reads:
“The legislature finds that the State of Texas never repealed, either expressly or by implication, the state statutes enacted before the ruling in Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), that prohibit and criminalize abortion unless the mother’s life is in danger.”
However, the challenge to this obvious exception, which exists in all 50 states as well, isn’t about just the life of the mother when her life is truly in danger. Abortion extremists want so much more by legally expanding the definitions in pro-life states as a workaround to life-saving protections for the preborn. So, they want the “life of the mother exception” to apply dangerous sepsis or fetal diagnosis (think Kate Cox aborting her Trisomy 18 baby), to stress over an exam, and they’re willing to use women like Zurwaski, as well as Amber Thurman, to do it.
And apparently, they’re willing to use Lawrence’s either blind or willful ignorance to put out abortion propaganda to the public, which is nothing new when it comes to promoting abortion extremism.
